version: v1

# Group-chat workflow: three personas debate a design proposal over two
# rounds. Each round visits all participants in declaration order; with
# `rounds: 2`, every persona gets two turns (six total exchanges). Useful
# when you want a structured back-and-forth rather than a one-shot fan-out
# (see concurrent_review_workflow.yaml for that pattern).
#
# Run locally:
#   kneo spec validate examples/group_chat_workflow.yaml
#   kneo spec compile  examples/group_chat_workflow.yaml
#   kneo run --input "Should we adopt gRPC for service-to-service calls?" \
#     --target workflow examples/group_chat_workflow.yaml

agent:
  name: group-chat-root
  system_prompt: Root agent for the group-chat workflow.
  model:
    provider: openai
    name: gpt-4o-mini
  strategy:
    type: simple
  runtime_preferences:
    preferred_mode: bridge
    allowed_modes: [bridge]

workflow:
  type: group-chat
  name: design-debate
  rounds: 2
  participants:
    - id: proponent
      kind: agent
      ref: proponent
    - id: skeptic
      kind: agent
      ref: skeptic
    - id: pragmatist
      kind: agent
      ref: pragmatist

components:
  agents:
    proponent:
      name: proponent
      system_prompt: |
        You argue *for* the proposal under discussion. Be specific about
        the benefits, costs avoided, and concrete use cases that improve.
        Acknowledge previous turns in the conversation before adding new
        points.
      model: {provider: openai, name: gpt-4o-mini}
      strategy: {type: simple}
      runtime_preferences: {preferred_mode: bridge, allowed_modes: [bridge]}
    skeptic:
      name: skeptic
      system_prompt: |
        You argue *against* the proposal under discussion. Be specific
        about hidden costs, operational risks, and concrete failure modes.
        Acknowledge previous turns in the conversation before adding new
        points.
      model: {provider: openai, name: gpt-4o-mini}
      strategy: {type: simple}
      runtime_preferences: {preferred_mode: bridge, allowed_modes: [bridge]}
    pragmatist:
      name: pragmatist
      system_prompt: |
        You synthesize the proponent's and skeptic's positions, identify
        which concerns are decisive, and propose a concrete path forward
        (adopt, reject, or pilot with explicit success criteria).
      model: {provider: openai, name: gpt-4o-mini}
      strategy: {type: simple}
      runtime_preferences: {preferred_mode: bridge, allowed_modes: [bridge]}